Legal Opinion

In re Burnelli

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 19, 1930No. 2205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office affirming the decision of the primary examiner finally rejecting claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 19, and 20 of appellant’s application. Upon the argument before us, appellant waived claims 3, 5, and 9, leaving for our consideration claims 1, 4, 19, and 20, which read as follows:

1. An airplane having a central supporting element having aerofoil contour, .said element constituting a fuselage, to enclosingly contain the complete load, the width o'f said element being uniform from its leading edge to a point near its rear…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re TuckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  2. Paper Container Mfg. Co. v. Dixie Cup Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. Aluminate Co. v. Akme Flue, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1931
  4. In re WiedmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. Application of George P. WiedmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API