Legal Opinion
Aluminate Co. v. Akme Flue, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 8, 1931No. 1685PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
The present suit arises under the patent laws and is based upon alleged infringement by the defendant of a patent upon a device for extracting soot and grease from flue gases escaping from gas ranges. The patent, No. 1,722,005, was issued July 23, 1929, to Joseph A. McCarthy, and the plain-' tiff now owns it by virtue of assignment. The patent contains sixteen claims, but infringement is based upon six claims only, namely, those numbered 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, and 16. Defendant’s device, of which plaintiff complains, is manufactured and marketed under patent No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Computing Scale Co. of America v. Automatic Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Weber Electric Co. v. E. H. Freeman Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Black & Decker Mfg. Co. v. Baltimore Truck Tire Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Victor Cooler Door Co. v. Jamison Cold Storage Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Diamond International Corporation v. WalterhoeferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968