Legal Opinion
State v. Lemmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 9, 2007No. A05-2481PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*653OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Following his arrest for boating while impaired, appellant Ronald Joseph Lem-mer challenged the administrative revocation of his driver’s license as permitted under Minnesota’s implied consent law. After an implied consent hearing, the district court concluded that the deputy sheriff did not have a particularized and objective basis for stopping Lemmer and rescinded the revocation of Lemmer’s license. At the subsequent driving while intoxicated (DWI) criminal prosecution, Lemmer asserted that the state was collaterally estopped from relitigating the validity of the stop…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Rucker v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State ex rel. Estate of Miles v. Village of PiketonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.