Legal Opinion
Rucker v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 5, 2011No. A08-1730PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Respondent Katherine M. Rucker successfully sued her ex-husband, Robert Rucker, for fraud on the court committed during a dissolution of marriage action. The trial court found that in the dissolution action Robert Rucker engaged in an intentional course of material misrepresentation and non-disclosure concerning the value of his business interest in The Tile Shop that resulted in a “grossly unfair” property settlement. Katherine Rucker subsequently sued Robert Rucker’s dissolution attorney and the law firm that employed him, appellants Steven B. Schmidt and Rider Bennett,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. ZweifelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Weinberger v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Plotner v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Laase v. County of IsantiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Hemmingsen v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Kerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Lane v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
- Bus. Dev. Corp. of S.C. v. Rutter & Russin, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.