Kates Corp. v. Kirshenbaum
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtWeisberger, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Superior Court in a case arising out of a dis pute over an alleged agreement to pay a real estate broker’s commission. The plaintiff, Kates Corporation (Kates), seeks to recover a commission on the sale of real property, located at Weeden Street and Reservoir Avenue in Pawtucket, by defendant Jordan B. Kirshenbaum to third-party defendant Philip B. Smiley (Smiley). The trial justice directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff s case.
The facts, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff and with all…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Calhoun v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Brause v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Johnson v. AuranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Goodyear Loan Company v. LittleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- Solin Lee Chu v. Ling Sun ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- MacKnight v. PanseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Payne v. K-D Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
- Estep v. Georgetown Leather Design, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Demers v. DemersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989