Legal Opinion

Kates Corp. v. Kirshenbaum

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 19, 1979No. 78-16-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeisberger, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Superior Court in a case arising out of a dis pute over an alleged agreement to pay a real estate broker’s commission. The plaintiff, Kates Corporation (Kates), seeks to recover a commission on the sale of real property, located at Weeden Street and Reservoir Avenue in Pawtucket, by defendant Jordan B. Kirshenbaum to third-party defendant Philip B. Smiley (Smiley). The trial justice directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff s case.

The facts, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff and with all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  2. Brause v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Johnson v. AuranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Goodyear Loan Company v. LittleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  5. Solin Lee Chu v. Ling Sun ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  2. MacKnight v. PanseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Payne v. K-D Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  4. Estep v. Georgetown Leather Design, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Demers v. DemersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API