Legal Opinion
Solin Lee Chu v. Ling Sun Chu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1959PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law, and the motion is granted to the extent of directing partial summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. It appears that the first cause of action is based upon an agreement which comes within the Statute of Frauds and is unenforcible (Personal Property Law, § 31). The letter written by the defendant is insufficient to take the agreement out of the statute as it does not contain all the essential terms of the ■ agreement as pleaded and upon which the plaintiff relies {Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Urtz v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by20 opinions
- Norton J. Lehman v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Fort Howard Paper Co. v. William D. Witter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Dorman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Dr. Werner Oswald v. Jane B. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Ideal Structures Corporation v. Levine Huntsville Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.