Legal Opinion

State ex inf. Hadley v. Meramec Rod & Gun Club

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original Proceeding by Quo Warranto.

1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.

This is an original proceeding. At the suit of the AttorneyJGeneral a writ of quo warranto was awarded against the Meramec Rod and Gun Club, citing it to show cause why its charter should not be revoked for misuser of its franchises in that it is alleged to be engaged in the business of selling liquor in violation of the local option law and to that end, maintains a resort in the nature of a bar-room and grog shop in the city of Kirkwood. The respondent appeared and answered. A commissioner was appointed by the court to take testimony. The proof made before the commissioner discloses the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bell v. St. Louis ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. State ex rel. Richey v. McGrathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Henderson v. LesueurSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Robinson v. Bacon ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. State ex inf. Hadleyy v. Rose Hill Pastime Athletic ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rockhill Tennis Club of Kansas City v. VolkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. State v. Business Men's ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. State Ex Inf. Otto v. Kansas City College of Medicine & SurgerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. State v. ZehnderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. State Ex Inf. Williamson v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API