Legal Opinion

State ex inf. Hadleyy v. Rose Hill Pastime Athletic Club

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original Proceeding by Quo Warranto'. '

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

Information in tbe nature of a quo warranto filed by tbe attorney general for dissolution of defendant corporation and forfeiture of its charter. After stating preliminary matter tbe information alleges:

“That in and by said articles of agreement tbe object and purpose of said corporation are stated to be
*82“ ‘To promote the physical development .of its members, to educate and train them in athletics, field sports and gymnastics, such as baseball, football, golf, tennis, running, jumping, lifting, throwing, wrestling, turning and bowling, to engage in and take part in athletic contests, to give…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Bell v. St. Louis ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Business Men's ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Meramec Rod & Gun ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. State v. ZehnderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. State v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. State v. Business Men's ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API