State Ex Inf. Otto v. Kansas City College of Medicine & Surgery

The relator filed in this court an information in the nature of a quo warranto seeking to oust the respondent from enjoying the powers and privileges of a corporation.

The relator sets out several alleged reasons why the corporate franchise of the respondent should be forfeited. The important ones of these may be summarized as follows:(a) That it keeps no intelligible record of its proceedings as a college.(b) That although the respondent (under what is now Article XI, Chapter 90, Revised Statutes 1919) was organized as a corporation for benevolent purposes, it is conducted for private profit…