Legal Opinion

State v. Business Men's Club

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Quo Warranto. (1) The contests staged under the auspices of respondent corporation were prize fights. State v. Patton, 64 N. E. 850; Seville v. State of Ohio, 15 L. R. A. (Old) 516; Commonwealth ex rel.

Read the full summary

Quo Warranto. (1) The contests staged under the auspices of respondent corporation were prize fights. State v. Patton, 64 N. E. 850; Seville v. State of Ohio, 15 L. R. A. (Old) 516; Commonwealth ex rel. Pratt v. McGovern, 66 L. R. A., 280; State v. Purtell, 43 Pac. 783; People v. Pioncan, 80 N. Y. Supp. 929. (2) The respondent, “The Business Men’s Athletic Club,” is a mere subterfuge and a scheme organized and conducted for the purpose of evading the law which prohibits the giving of public sparring or boxing exhibitions. State ex inf. Hadley y. Rose Hill Pastime Athletic Club, 121 Mo. App.…

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, P. J.

The prosecuting attorney of Greene county filed in this court his information alleging that the defendant was organized as a corporation ostensibly under the provisions of Chapter 33, Article 10, Revised Statutes of 1909, authorizing the incorporation of associations for benevolent, religious, educational and scientific purposes, and charged that the respondent had grossly perverted and misused its charter authority, franchises and privileges, and unlawfully usurped franchises and privileges not granted it by the laws of the State of Missouri, especially in that it had not pursued the objects…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. Rensselaer & Saratoga Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. State ex rel. Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. State ex inf. Hadley v. Delmar Jockey ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Ward v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Rockhill Tennis Club of Kansas City v. VolkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. State Bd. of Tax Commrs. v. Ft. Wayne Sport Club, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State Ex Inf. Danforth v. Dale Curteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API