Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1923No. Civ. No. 4139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

On the seventeenth day of August, 1921, the petitioner was indicted by the grand jury of Los Angeles County for the crime of perjury. To this indictment a demurrer was interposed on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, and the superior court ordered the same sustained, in making of which ruling the following language was used: “Demurrer to indictment sustained and case ordered resubmitted to the grand jury.” The district attorney thereupon resubmitted the case to the same grand jury, and a second indictment was returned against the petitioner also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Ex parte WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Terrill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ex Parte HayterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Matter of Application of JuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Brunnabend v. TibblesMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. State v. RaulieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  5. County of Los Angeles v. RickertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API