Ex Parte Hayter
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for discharge upon writ of habeas corpus after demurrer sustained to an information in the Superior Court of Merced County. E. N. Rector, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The petition alleges that, on the twenty-sixth day of October, 1910, a complaint was filed in the justice’s court of township No. 2, in the county of Merced, jointly charging the petitioner and one Walter Hayter with the crime of obtaining property from one A. Dastrevigne by false and fraudulent representations. A warrant was thereupon issued by the magistrate, and, on the fifth day of November, 1910, said warrant was served on the petitioner, who was brought before said magistrate, by whom petitioner was, on the fifteenth day of December, 1910, preliminarily examined on said charge and an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Ex parte WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. CrookUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Terrill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- In Re Application of HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. VaughnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.