State v. Raulie
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BICKLEY, C. J.
Appellant was indicted and put to trial upon a charge of rape. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. Sentence was pronounced, from which appeal is taken. Facts sufficient for an understanding of the points presented will appear as we proceed.
Appellant’s first contention is that the indictment is void because it was not returned by a lawful grand jury; said grand jury having been in law discharged prior to the finding of said' indictment. The facts are that a grand jury was impaneled, began and continued its work until February 7, 1929, whereupon it returned…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- State v. StewartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GunthorpeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. GodwinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. KimbellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930