Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Rickert

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1927No. Docket No. 5054PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLUCAS, J., pro tem.

Action on a hail hond. Defendants appeal on the judgment-roll alone.

Appellants concede that all the facts are contained in the findings of the trial court. According to the findings, there was filed on December 9, 1921, in the superior court of the state of California, in and for the county of Los Angeles, an indictment entitled “People of the State of California v. W. S. Kirby,” being case No. 17,481, wherein the defendant was charged with the crime of bribery. On said day the court admitted said defendant to bail in the sum of ten thousand dollars and ordered that he be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Copeland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Matter of Application of JuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McDonough v. Chu Chew ShongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. County of Los Angeles v. DelahuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API