Reilly Foam Corp. v. Rubbermaid Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SCHILLER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
A dispute between Plaintiff Reilly Foam Corporation (“Reilly Foam”) and Defendant Rubbermaid Corporation (“Rubbermaid”) over a contract for sponges results in the Court doing the mopping-up. Reilly Foam alleges that it contracted to supply Rubbermaid with its requirements for certain sponges for assembly into mops sold to Target stores. Reilly Foam alleges that rather than obtaining sponges solely from Reilly Foam, Rubbermaid continued to obtain sponges from another supplier and failed to make set minimum purchases. Rubbermaid denies…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Ingrassia Const. Co., Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Whitaker v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Eaton Metal Products Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Brisbin v. Superior Valve Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Harold Ex Rel. Estate of Harold v. McGannDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- McGuckin v. Allstate Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.