Legal Opinion
Brisbin v. Superior Valve Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 14, 2005No. 03-1793, 03-1851PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
This dispute arises out of a long-term supply relationship gone bad. The plaintiff is Kirk Brisbin, an individual doing-business as Specialty Manufacturing (“Specialty”). 1 Superior Valve Company (“Superior”), one of the named defendants, was acquired by defendant Harsco Corporation in the fall of 1998. After a bench trial, judgment ultimately was entered in favor of Specialty in the amount of $746,675. On appeal, we review the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions regarding adequate assurance and damage issues. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Palazzo v. CorioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Richmond Leasing Co. v. Capital Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Prusky Ex Rel. Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Reliastar Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Montanez v. HSBC Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Spring Creek Holding Company, Inc. v. Shinnihon USA Co., Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Rocheux International of New Jersey, Inc. v. U.S. Merchants Financial Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Benchmark Group, Inc. v. Penn Tank Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.