United States v. Juanita Kendricks
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Juanita Kendricks appeals from her criminal conviction in a jury trial before the Eastern District of Michigan. 1 The primary issue is whether defendant’s right to cross-examine adverse witnesses, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, is violated by the admission of evidence of extrajudicial statements uttered by a non-testifying co-defendant during the commission of an unlawful act. The statements incriminated the defendant. We find this and the other allegations of error to be without merit. Thus, the conviction is affirmed.
I
Cynthia Wiley, a government informant since October 1976, had known…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Charles Vinson, United States of America v. Arlie B. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Sterling Hamilton, Scotty Hamilton, Anthony Bryan Salisbury and Earl Wayne WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. HiggsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.