United States v. Sterling Hamilton, Scotty Hamilton, Anthony Bryan Salisbury and Earl Wayne Wright
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Senior Circuit Judge.
In the district court, the four defendants now before us on appeal were convicted by a jury and sentenced for conspiring to engage in the business of dealing in explosives without a federal license in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 371. Three of the defendants Earl Wright, Anthony Salisbury and Sterling Hamilton, were also convicted and sentenced on the underlying substantive offense, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 842(a)(1), and on various other violations of 18 U.S.C., Chapter 40 (Importation, Manufacture, Distribution and Storage of Explosive Materials). For the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- United States v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Roy C. Blakeney (90-5664), Kenneth A. Kutnyak (90-5665), and James E. Box (90-6041)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/ (99-1003) v. Jack William Tocco, (98-2312/2426)/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.