Am. Nat. Bank of McAlester v. Mergenthaler Linotype
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Preslie B. Col'e, Judge. Action by the Mergenthaler Linotype Company against the American National Bank of MeAlester and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.
On February 17, 1907, the Mergenthaler Linotype Company, defendant in error, as plaintiff, filed its complaint in equity in the United States Court for the Indian Territory, Central District at MeAlester, against William A. Hinds,' American National Bank of South MeAlester, J. Puterbaugh, and the Capital Printing Company, as defendants. After answers filed there was a reference and a report of the referee upon an' agreed statement of facts, which said report, after exceptions thereto filed, the court sustained, and on November 8, 1908, rendered judgment thereon in favor of plaintiff and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Humphrey v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Strange v. CrismonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- J. W. Ripey Son v. the Art Wall Paper MillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ætna Life Insurance v. KoonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Richardson Et Vir v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Zahn v. ObertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- May v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.