Hughes v. Miller
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Johnson District Court. Action by M. G. Miller against Mary E. Gorsuch and others to recover on a promissory note and-to foreclose a mortgage given to secure its payment. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendants Mary J. Hughes and Benjamin Reeder bring the case to this court. All the material facts are stated in the opinion herein, filed December 7, 1895.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.: M. G. Miller brought an action to recover $1,326, with interest thereon, due upon a promissory note executed by Luke E. Gorsuch and Mary E. Gorsuch, and to foreclose a real-estate mortgage which they had executed to secure the payment of the note. Luke E. Gorsuch had died, and his widow and children, who were the heirs at law of the deceased, were made defendants, as were also Mary J. Hughes and Benjamin Reeder, who claimed an interest in the mortgaged premises. Mary J. Hughes and Benjamin Reeder answered separately, demanding judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- J. J. Funsten & Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Peoples State Bank v. Hoisington Cooperative Mercantile Manufacturing Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Phelps v. LodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Commercial National Bank of Ogden v. United States Savings, Loan & Building Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. DillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910