Legal Opinion

Waterland v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1940No. Sac. 5324PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The sole question presented upon this application for a writ of prohibition is whether the superior court, sitting in probate, has the jurisdiction to determine, as an incident to the settling of a final account of an executor, who previous to the rendering of said account has filed his resignation as executor, title to certain personal property formerly owned by the decedent, but claimed by the said executor as his own personal property by virtue of the fact that said personal property consists of a fund on deposit in a joint tenancy account in the names of the decedent and the executor. Or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bauer v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Guardianship of VucinichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stevens v. Superior Court of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. In Re the Estate of KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Estate of RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re the Estate of RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Watkins v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Dobbins v. Title Guarantee & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Estate of GillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API