Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Randall

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1942No. 7007PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C.J.

Two previous appeals herein culminated in a determination that a will, filed by, and under which appellants (daughters of deceased intestate) had been appointed executrices, was invalid and had been procured by them by fraud and undue influence. (Estate of Randall, 58 Ida. 143, 70 P. (2d) 389, 60 Ida. 419, 93 P. (2d) 1.)

Whereupon, respondent Aimer on E. Randall (son of deceased) was appointed by the Probate Court administrator of the estate involved. Thereupon, appellants, as retiring executrices, filed ¡their final account in said court for approval. Upon objections interposed thereto, and…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Leedom v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. McCown v. FraserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. In re Dolenty's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bauer v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gmeiner v. YacteIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Chase v. ReidIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Pincock v. Pocatello Gold & Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Keenan v. BrooksIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. McNabb v. BrewsterIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API