Legal Opinion

Department of Labor & Industries v. Avundes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2000No. 68103-1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This case requires us to decide whether an injured worker’s employment was essentially intermittent under RCW 51.08.178(2). The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) found the worker’s employment was essentially intermittent and, therefore, determined his wages by the wage averaging provision set forth in RCW 51.08.178(2)(b). The Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (BIIA) reversed, finding the worker not intermittent under RCW 51.08.178(2). The superior court and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Eladio Abundes (Abundes)1 was employed as a general farm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Double D Hop Ranch v. SanchezWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Double D Hop Ranch v. SanchezWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Department of Labor & Industries v. AvundesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Watson v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Watson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Department of Labor & Industries v. GrangerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Department v. GrangerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Malang v. DEPARTMENT OF L&ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API