Legal Opinion
Department of Labor & Industries v. Avundes
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 22, 1999No. 17097-7-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKato, J.
— The Department of Labor and Industries appeals a superior court judgment affirming an administrative order holding a farm worker’s employment status was not “intermittent” for the purpose of computing time-loss compensation. The Department contends the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals and the superior court improperly applied RCW 51.08.178(2). We affirm.
Eladio Abundes, 1 a 65-year-old farm worker, came to the United States in March 1993. He was injured on May 24, 1994, while he was working at Yorgesen Farms. Before his injury, he had worked at Yorgesen Farms for 50 days, starting on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Double D Hop Ranch v. SanchezWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Double D Hop Ranch v. SanchezWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Romo v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Watson v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Watson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Department of Labor & Industries v. AvundesWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Department of Labor & Industries v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Gorre v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.