Department of Labor & Industries v. Granger
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — The Department of Labor and Industries (Department) seeks review of a decision of Division One of the Court of Appeals which determined that the health care payments Granger’s employer made to a trust on his behalf should be included in his monthly wage calculation for purposes of determining disability benefits. The Department argues that because Granger was not eligible to receive the benefits of that trust at the time of his injury, the payments made to the trust should not be included in the calculation. Granger argues that because his employer was paying $2.15 per hour to the trust…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Tesoro Refining & Marketing v. State, DorWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Malang v. DEPARTMENT OF L&ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Malang v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.