Legal Opinion
Byrne v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 26, 1992No. 92 Civ. 342 (PKL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Defendant seeks an order pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the complaint in this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion to dismiss the action is denied.
BACKGROUND
The essential facts relevant to this motion are undisputed. This action arises under the Federal Tort Claims Act (the “FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. Plaintiff George Byrne alleges that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gaf Corporation v. United States of America. Keene Corporation v. United States of America. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Gary L. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Carrick v. Central General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- 55 Motor Avenue Co. v. Liberty Industrial Finishing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Romulus v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Pagel v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Matthias v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.