Legal Opinion
Romulus v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 28, 1997No. Civil Action CV-96-0920 (DGT)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge.
This is an action brought under the Federal. Tort .Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (1994). Plaintiffs Marie and Pierrot Romulus seek damages for injuries caused by a collision between a ear driven by Marie Romulus and a United States Postal Service truck. The government has moved to dismiss the claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, on the ground that plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative remedy, a jurisdictional predicate. Plaintiffs contend that subject matter…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gaf Corporation v. United States of America. Keene Corporation v. United States of America. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Gary L. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Marie C. Romulus and Pierrot Romulus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Furman v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Donahue v. United States, Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.