Legal Opinion

Pagel v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 19, 1997No. C-97-20091 EAIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

INFANTE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant United States of America moves, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, for summary judgment, and, in the alternative, for summary adjudication on Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is based on the claim that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Defendant’s alternative motion for summary adjudication, which is directed to Plaintiff Karen…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Gaf Corporation v. United States of America. Keene Corporation v. United States of America. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Mildred Jerves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Gary L. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Waters v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API