Legal Opinion
Consolidated Fibers, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 22, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-80; Court 06-00134PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge.
Plaintiffs move for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2, challenging .the final results of the United States International Trade Commission’s (“Commission”) five-year reviews of the antidumping duty orders on polyester staple fiber (“PSF”) from Korea and Taiwan. See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea and Taiwan, Inv. Nos. 731-TA-825 and 826 (Final), USITC Pub. 3843 (Mar. 2006) (“Sunset Reviews"). 1 The court has jurisdiction to review Plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to Section 516A(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Consolidated Fibers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
3Cited by1 opinion
- AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012