Legal Opinion

Valencia v. Markham Co-Operative Assn.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1941No. Nos. 32,655, 32,656PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

These appeals involve two cases, tried together, in which verdicts were returned for defendants. The actions arose out of a collision which occurred in the city of Duluth on August 10, 1935, between an automobile owned by plaintiff Mike Valencia and driven by plaintiff Mary Valencia, wife of Mike, and a truck owned by defendant Markham Co-operative Association and driven by defendant Ed Nevanen, its employe. As the appeals must stand or fall together, we will confine this opinion to the facts as they appear in the Mary Valencia action.

The case was tried in May, 1938.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lampsen v. BranderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Hyman v. DworskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Geisler v. GeislerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Merek v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Austin v. RoseckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Schiro v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API