Legal Opinion
Geisler v. Geisler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 7, 1924No. 23,712PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Appeal from the order of the district court of Hennepin county denying a motion for a new trial. The matter was heard in the district court upon an appeal from the probate court. The decree of the probate court which vested the estate of Louis Geisler in William and Christopher Geisler, to the exclusion of the appellant, Emma Geisler, was affirmed.
Emma Geisler, born in 1856 or 1857, was an illegitimate child of Caroline Wittlieb, who married William Geisler on March 14, 1858. To this marriage three sons were born, Louis, William and Christopher. William Geisler, Sr. died in 1889, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chadwick v. CornishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Redding v. GodwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Houlton v. ManteuffelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Whalen v. NisbetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Wray's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- United States v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Carfa v. AlbrightWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re Estate of HolumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Valencia v. Markham Co-Operative Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.