Legal Opinion

Lampsen v. Brander

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1881PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The complaint in this action, brought in the municipal court .of the city of Minneapolis, alleges that on or about October 1, 1880, the plaintiff was the owner and in possession, in Hennepin county, Minnesota, of a cane mill, personal property, of the value of $50, and that the defendants, on that day, wrongfully and unlawfully took and carried away said mill from the possession of the plaintiff, and converted the same to their own use, to plaintiff’s damage, etc. The defendants answer jointly, and after denying ownership and possession of the mill in the plaintiff, they deny “that they, or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. Guyot v. ButtsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Ables v. DonleyTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  4. S. & F. Dorr & Co. v. WatsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Marsh v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Hoye v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Peck v. SmallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API