Legal Opinion

City of Spokane v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2002No. 70765-1PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

This case concerns the apportionment of sewerage1 between collection sewerage subject to the 3.6 percent public utility tax and sewerage concerned with the transportation and treatment of sewage, which is subject to the business and occupation (B&O) services tax rate. The B&O tax rate varies, but is always lower than the public utility tax rate, and at the time of the complaint was 2.0 percent. At an administrative hearing, the Board of Tax Appeals (BTA) concluded that collection (subject to the higher tax rate) continues up to the point where no new sewage is introduced into the system. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Tingey v. HaischWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Tingey v. HaischWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API