Legal Opinion

Tingey v. Haisch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2007No. 77689-0PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

152 P.3d 1020 (2007)

David L. TINGEY, Petitioner,

v.

Lloyd HAISCH and Lucy Haisch, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Respondents.

No. 77689-0.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued September 19, 2006.

Decided February 15, 2007.

David L. Tingey, Law Office of David L. Tingey, Renton, for Petitioner.

Harold J. Moberg, Moses Lake, for Respondents.

FAIRHURST, J.

¶ 1 Petitioner attorney David Tingey performed legal services for respondents Lloyd and Lucy Haisch (hereinafter Haisch) on an hourly fee basis without a written fee agreement. Tingey challenges a Court of Appeals…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Udall v. TD Escrow Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API