Legal Opinion

Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Department of Ecology

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2013No. 87672-0PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 This case involves the validity of an amended rule from the Department of Ecology that reserves water from the Skagit River system for future year-round out-of-stream uses, despite the fact that in times of low stream flows these uses will impair established minimum instream flows necessary for fish, wildlife, recreation, navigation, and scenic and aesthetic values. Ecology relies on RCW 90.54.020(3)(a) for authority to make the reservations of water despite the existing minimum flows. This statutory provision allows impairment of stream base flows when overriding considerations of public…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Pud No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of EcologySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Foster v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Whatcom County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. James C. Blair, II v. Northwest Trustee ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Washington State Hospital Ass'n v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API