Continental Insurance v. Portwood
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action by J. A. Portwood against the Continental Insurance Company to recover on two policies of fire insurance. One of the policies covered a barn and a dwelling house, and the other policy covered certain grain and hay. Plaintiff sustained a total loss on the barn and grain and hay. Both policies contained a provision requiring sworn proof of loss to be furnished by the insured within 60 days after the fire. Both policies also contained a provision relating to vacancy and unoceupancy, which reads in part as follows :
“Permission given for any of the buildings herein described to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Continental Ins. Co. v. ChanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gish v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co. v. WagesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- O'Neal v. HarperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Sexton v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Gay & Taylor, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981
- Knapp v. Independence Life and Accident Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Allied Steel Construction Co. v. Employers Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.