Legal Opinion

Mills v. Maryland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 6, 1988No. 87-5367PublishedCited by 1,330 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

Petitioner seeks review of a decision of Maryland’s highest court which construes that State’s capital sentencing scheme in a manner that preserves its constitutionality but which may not have been evident at all to the jury charged with the sentencing function in this case. Because, we have no reason to believe that the jury also arrived at this “saving” construction, we must vacate the sentence of death and remand the case for resentencing.

I

Petitioner Ralph Mills was tried by a state-court jury and convicted of the first-degree murder of his cellmate in the Maryland Correctional Institution…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,330 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

1,325 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API