Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of W.L.H.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 23, 1996No. C5-96-803Published
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a pretrial suppression order in a juvenile delinquency proceeding that has been designated an extended jurisdiction juvenile (EJJ) proceeding. Respondent W.L.H. has moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely. We agree and dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
The state filed a juvenile delinquency petition alleging that respondent W.L.H. had committed a first-degree controlled substance offense. Respondent was 15 years old when the offense allegedly occurred.
The state moved to certify W.L.H. for adult prosecution. This motion was dismissed but the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Essling v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. WollanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- City of Albert Lea v. HarrerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Lecy v. Sage Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. SchermerhornCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986