Legal Opinion

Nearman/Miller v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2016No. SC S063787 (Control); SC S063789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 51 (2016) (IP 51), arguing that the ballot title does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 250.035(2). This court reviews a certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with the requirements of that statute. ORS 250.085(5). For the following reasons, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

IP 51 is a proposed constitutional amendment that, if adopted by the voters, would change current voter registration methods for federal, state, and local…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Kobach v. United States Election Assistance CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Johnson v. CITY OF ASTORIAOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Mabon v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Project Vote, Inc. v. KempDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  2. United States v. LouisianaDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2016
  3. Ady v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Ady v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  5. PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION v. TAHESHA WAYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API