Legal Opinion

Stamm v. Crowley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 1, 2004No. 50836-9-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

In guardianship proceedings, a guardian ad litem (GAL) must be appointed to investigate and make recommendations to the court. While we hold that the trial court may admit a GAL’s testimony regarding her opinion and the basis for that opinion if the court finds the evidence likely to be helpful under ER 702, there are limits to such testimony and a jury must understand that it is to evaluate the GAL’s testimony in the same manner as the testimony of any other witness. Those limits were not honored here when the GAL testified that she had a special role in assessing credibility and in serving…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Burrell v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Dependency of KSCWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Boeing Co. v. HeidyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lillig v. Becton-DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Endicott v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. In Re Marriage of BobbittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. In re the Marriage of BobbittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. In RE GUARDIANSHIP OF STAMM v. CrowleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Endicott v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API