Legal Opinion
In RE GUARDIANSHIP OF STAMM v. Crowley
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 1, 2004No. 50836-9-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
91 P.3d 126 (2004)
121 Wash.App. 830
In re The GUARDIANSHIP OF Loren STAMM, An alleged incapacitated person, Appellant,
v.
Karen A. CROWLEY and Michael R. Stamm, Respondents.
No. 50836-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 1, 2004.
Margaret K. Dore, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
William L.E. Dussault, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
SCHINDLER, J.
In guardianship proceedings, a guardian ad litem (GAL) must be appointed to investigate and make recommendations to the court. While we hold that the trial court may admit a GAL's testimony regarding her opinion and the basis for that opinion if the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Burrell v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Boeing Co. v. HeidyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Lillig v. Becton-DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Boeing Co. v. HeidyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Endicott v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In Re Marriage of BobbittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- In re the Marriage of BobbittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Endicott v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Christopher James Burrows v. Alicia Ann De GonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.