Legal Opinion
Endicott v. Saul
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 4, 2008No. 58435-9-I, 58531-2-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
176 P.3d 560 (2008)
Ronald ENDICOTT and Donald Endicott, Respondents,
v.
Robert and Samantha SAUL, husband and wife, and Linda and Vernon Gabelein, husband and wife, Appellants. and
Emma Endicott, Appellant,
v.
Ronald Endicott and Donald Endicott, Respondents.
Nos. 58435-9-I, 58531-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
February 4, 2008.
John W. Demco, L'Nayim Shuman-Austin, Demco Law Firm PS, Matthew F. Davis, Attorney at Law, Seattle; WA, H. Clarke Harvey, Attorney at Law, Clinton, WA, for Appellants.
Carolyn Cliff, Attorney at Law, Langley, WA, for Respondents.
Michael Mert Waller, Zylstra…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- González Hernández v. González HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
- Guardianship Of Thomas HawesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020