Lillig v. Becton-Dickinson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, C.J.
We accepted this case for review to *655determine whether at trial there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of abuse of a qualified privilege and to support a denial of exemplary damages pursuant to RCW 49.52.070. We find no evidence in the record sufficient to overcome the defendant's qualified privilege and we find sufficient evidence of a bona fide dispute adequate to uphold a denial of exemplary damages. We, therefore, affirm the Court of Appeals.
I
Michael Lillig worked for Becton-Dickinson (B-D) as a medical supply salesman. In addition to salary, B-D offered an incentive bonus…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Gem Trading Co. v. Cudahy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. EppensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Chelan County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of ChelanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Caruso v. LOCAL 690 INTERNL. BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERSWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. ValentineWashington Supreme Court · 1997
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.