Legal Opinion

In re Wiley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari to Wayne; Webster, J. George Wiley was adjudged guilty of contempt of court.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Rose- McFarland, in her petition, filed some time in May, 1918, sought to obtain an order by which a part of the property and estate of her husband, Russell M. McFarland, or a part of his earnings and income, should be allotted, assigned, set apart and paid to her “as alimony and for her support and maintenance,” relying upon the provisions of—

“An act to provide wives with property and maintenance from their husband’s estates when neglected or deserted by them, or when the husband has become an habitual drunkard or has practiced extreme cruelty towards his wife or committed any offense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bragg v. GaynorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Twing v. O'MearaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Ehlers v. StoeckleMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeKuyper v. DeKuyperMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API