Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of Cincinnati
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. The cáse is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis
Mrs. Pennington obtained in a state court of Ohio a decree of divorce which is admitted to be valid. In the same proceeding she sought alimony; and in order to ensure its payment joined as a defendant the Fourth National Bank of Cincinnati in which her husband had a deposit account. When the suit was filed the court entered a preliminary order enjoining the bank from paying out any part of the deposit. Under later orders of the court-the bank made payments from it to the wife. Finally it was perpetually enjoined from making any payment to the husband and ordered to pay the balance to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Tyler v. Judges of Court of RegistrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Standard Oil Co. v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.