Legal Opinion

Ehlers v. Stoeckle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Mason. Proceeding at law in the nature or a Creditor’s Bill. The facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

This ivas a proceeding at law in the nature of a creditor’s bill, and was had before the circuit judge at chambers. The object was to reach certain property in the hands of George Stoeckle and August Tiederman which was supposed to belong to the judgment debtor, and to have been placed in their hands to keep it beyond the reach of creditors. The proceeding was instituted by a complaint by the judgment creditors, based upon which was an order by the circuit judge for the appearance of the defendant for examination. The examination took place, and Tiederman and George Stoeckle were sworn .as…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Johnson v. BeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Lavean v. CowelsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
  4. Brown v. EdmondsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Remes v. Robison (In Re Van Houten)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API