Legal Opinion

Pehrson v. Saderup

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1972No. 12723PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs initiated this action to recover damages from defendants for the act of defendants’ agent in cutting down certain lilacs: growing near the boundary line of their respective properties. Plaintiffs sought treble damages under Sec. 78-38-3, U.C.A.1953. The matter was tried before the court, and plaintiffs were awarded $50 damages, which were trebled. Plaintiffs appéal, and defendants cross-appeal.

Defendants were the owners of a piece of real property upon which they had erected an apartment house. They desired to extend the parking lot in an area which was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Samson Construction Co. v. BrusowankinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Huber v. SerpicoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. McDonald v. Montana Wood Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Brereton v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Pitts v. Pine Meadow Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ault v. DuboisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. Thorsen v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Pitts v. Pine Meadow Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API