Pehrson v. Saderup
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Chief Justice:
Plaintiffs initiated this action to recover damages from defendants for the act of defendants’ agent in cutting down certain lilacs: growing near the boundary line of their respective properties. Plaintiffs sought treble damages under Sec. 78-38-3, U.C.A.1953. The matter was tried before the court, and plaintiffs were awarded $50 damages, which were trebled. Plaintiffs appéal, and defendants cross-appeal.
Defendants were the owners of a piece of real property upon which they had erected an apartment house. They desired to extend the parking lot in an area which was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
- Samson Construction Co. v. BrusowankinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Huber v. SerpicoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- McDonald v. Montana Wood Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1894
- Brereton v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Pitts v. Pine Meadow Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
- Ault v. DuboisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Thorsen v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Pitts v. Pine Meadow Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.