In the Matter of a Grand Jury Investigation
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
This appeal arises from a petition brought under G. L. c. 211, § 3, challenging a Superior Court judge’s order approving the issuance of a grand jury subpoena duces tecum that compels a law firm to produce a cellular telephone. The single justice reserved and reported the matter to this court, and our analysis is confined to the limited record before us.
The Commonwealth contends that the telephone belonged to John Doe,1 the target of a grand jury investigation; that it was transferred from Doe to the law firm to obtain legal advice; and that it contains in the information stored on its…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. HubbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. NashMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Blaisdell v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CostaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- In re G.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.