Legal Opinion

United States v. Hubbell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 5, 2000No. 99-166PublishedCited by 336 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The two questions presented concern the scope of a witness’ protection against compelled self-incrimination: (1) whether the Fifth Amendment privilege1 protects a *30witness from being compelled to disclose the existence of incriminating documents that the Government is unatile to describe with reasonable particularity; and (2) if the witness produces such documents pursuant to a grant of immunity, whether 18 U. S. C. § 6002 prevents the Government from using them to prepare criminal charges against him.2

I

This proceeding arises out of the second prosecution of respondent, Webster Hubbell,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by336 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Crowe v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019

331 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API