Legal Opinion

State v. Emmich

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 1978No. 75-84 C, CA 9469PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for violation of former ORS 92.325(1) of the Oregon Subdivision Control Law, which provided:

"No person shall offer any subdivided lands for sale or lease after January 25,1974, without having complied with all the applicable provisions of ORS 92.305 to 92.495 and 92.820.”

The indictment charged that the defendant

"* * * did unlawfully and knowingly, as subdivider sell subdivided lands to one Lurena D. Carbaugh, located in Township 37 South * * * without having complied with the Oregon Subdivision Control Law as required in Oregon Revised Statutes 92.325(1) in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PierreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Cabler v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. City of Lake Oswego v. Grimm's Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. VasbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Spaulding v. McCaigeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Lovinger v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Maxwell v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. EmmichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API